Of the 45 resistance trained men who participated in the study one group received either 4.5 grams GPLC or 4.5 grams cellulose (PL) 90 minutes before performing two testing sessions; one with, one without GPLC supplementation. The exercise protocol itself consisted of five 10-second Wingate cycle sprints separated by 1-minute active recovery periods. This first test was then followed by a supplementation period where subjects were randomly assigned to receive 1.5 g, 3.0 g, or 4.5 g GPLC per day for a 28 day with another third test following the four weeks of GPLC supplementation using the same testing protocol. The results are quite intriguing:
[...] results indicated that sprint bouts three, four and five produced 2 - 5% lower values of [peak power] PP and 3 - 7% lower values of [mean power] MP with GPLC at 3.0 or 4.5g per day as compared to baseline values. Conversely, 1.5g GPLC produced 3 - 6% higher values of PP and 2 -5% higher values of MP compared with PL baseline values. Values of [percentage decrement of performance] DEC were significantly greater (15-20%) greater across the five sprint bouts with 3.0g or 4.5g GPLC, but the 1.5g GPLC supplementation produced DEC values -5%, -3%, +4%, +5%, and +2% different from the baseline PL values. The 1.5 g group displayed a statistically significant 24% reduction in net lactate accumulation per unit power output (p<0.05).The graphical presentation renders it even more obvious that in the case of GPLC, as so often, more is not always more:
Figure 1: Mean power in exercise test after 4 week supplementation of 1.5g; 3.0g; 4.5g of PLCAR |
0 comments:
Post a Comment