Figure 1: EGCG molecule (HMDB v2.5) |
Contrary to our hypothesis, RMR was not greater (P = 0.10) following consumption of EGCG (6,740 ± 373 kJ/day) compared with placebo (6,971 ± 352). Similarly, the area under the TEF response curve (Δ energy expenditure) was also unaffected by EGCG (246,808 ± 23,748 vs. 243,270 ± 22,177 kJ; P = 0.88). EGCG had no effect on respiratory exchange ratio at rest (P = 0.29) or throughout the TEF measurement (P = 0.56).With RMR and TEF accounting for up to 85% of total daily energy expenditure the use of commercially available EGCG supplement to "burn" off the nasty love handles is absolutely useless.
0 comments:
Post a Comment